| Ch 6 | Example of Cancer Classification | |
| Cancer Classification |
Cervix Uteri Cancer | |
One of the most frequently used classifications is the classification by the “Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie Obstétrique” (FIGO) which has allowed comparisons between hospital series for more than 40 years.
The following drawings are available:
The following table compares the TNM and FIGO classifications.
In order to obtain an accurate clinical classification, the FIGO organisation recommends a gynaecological examination under general anaesthesia.
In the past, a pelvic lymphographia was recommended to determine node metastases; it has now been replaced by abdominopelvic CT scan. This examination reveals any ureteral dilatation in relation to a compression by parametrial tumour invasion, as well as kidney malfunction.
| TNM |
FIGO |
Description |
| Tx |
Primary tumour cannot be assessed | |
| T0 |
No evidence of primary tumour | |
| Tis |
St 0 |
Carcinoma in situ |
| T1
|
St I
|
Cervical carcinoma confined to cervix
uteri
Clinically visible lesion confined to the cervix
|
| T2 |
St II |
Cervical carcinoma invading beyond cervix uteri but not to pelvic wall or to the lower third of the vagina
Tumour with parametrial involvement |
T3 |
St III |
Tumour extending to the pelvic wall and/or
involving the lower third of the vagina, and/or causing hydronephrosis
or kidney malfunction. Tumour extending to pelvic wall and/or causing hydronephrosis or
kidney malfunction. |
| T4 | St IVa | Tumour invading mucosa of the bladder or rectum, and/or extending beyond true pelvis |
| M1 |
St IVb |
Distant metastasis |
| N | Description |
| NX | Regional nodes cannot be assessed |
| N0 | No regional lymph node metastasis |
| N1 | Metastasis to regional lymph nodes |
These results are issued from a recent publication by FIGO on 32,500 patients
treated around the world. (Annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological
cancer. Twenty-first volume. Statements of results obtained in patients treated
from 1982 to 1986, inclusive 3 and 5-year survival up to 1990. Int
J Gynaecol Obstet. 1991 Sep;36 Suppl:1-315)
| % of patients | Stage | 5 year survival |
| 38% |
T1 |
82% |
| 32% |
T2 |
62% |
| 26% |
T3 |
37% |
| 4% |
T4 |
12% |
As soon as T2, the prognosis of cervix uteri cancer is limited. Such forms would never be observed if efficient screening programs were set up.
The following table displays the extent to which node invasion is detrimental to prognosis.
| Stage | 5 year survival |
| T1a |
99 % |
| T1b, N0 |
90 % |
| T1b, N1 |
60 % |
| T2b, N0 |
85 % |
| T2b, N1 |
49 % |
For French speaking readers, the Lorraine oncology network website Oncolor is very interesting and describes classification and decision trees.
For English speaking readers, the NCI website is most valuable.
For pathology the website Webpath from Univeristy of Florida is also very useful.